[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Statistical info::
::
Indexing and Abstracting
..
Islamic Economic Association Of Iran
 
..
Social Media
 


..
Paper Plagiarism Checker
 
..
:: Volume 13, Issue 49 (Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economics Policies 2025) ::
qjfep 2025, 13(49): 7-34 Back to browse issues page
Analyzing the Relationship Between Institutional Ownership and Systematic Risk with Emphasis on the Role of Corporate Governance: Using GMM and EGLS Methods
Hossein Ameri *
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Mazandaran
Abstract:   (389 Views)
This study investigates the moderating role of corporate governance in the relationship between institutional ownership and systematic risk in Iran's capital market. The statistical population consists of all companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. A total of 632 firm-year observations were examined over the period 1395-1402. To analyze the data, two regression models were employed: the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) and the Estimated Generalized Least Squares (EGLS). The results indicate that institutional ownership has a positive and significant effect on systematic risk, suggesting that higher institutional ownership is associated with increased systematic risk in firms. Furthermore, corporate governance plays a moderating role in this relationship. Specifically, effective corporate governance mechanisms can mitigate the adverse impact of institutional ownership on systematic risk. These findings are confirmed by both the GMM and EGLS models with statistically significant coefficients at the 95% confidence level. Overall, the study highlights that strengthening corporate governance can contribute to reducing systematic risk in Iran's capital market. The findings offer useful insights for managers and policymakers aiming to improve governance frameworks and manage risk more effectively.
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Institutional Ownership, Systematic Risk, GMM Model, EGLS Model.
Full-Text [PDF 1094 kb]   (144 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. بنی مهد، بهمن؛ عربی، مهدی؛ حسن‌پور، شیوا (۱۳۹۷). پژوهش‌های تجربی و روش‌شناسی در حسابداری، چاپ پنجم، انتشارات ترمه.
2. ترشیزی، علی و بزاززاده تربتی، حمیدرضا (1397). رابطه بین حاکمیت شرکتی و ریسک شرکت: نقش تعدیل‌کننده مسئولیت اجتماعی. دانش حسابداری مالی، 5(3)،135-151.
3. شباهنگ، رضا (1381). تئوری حسابداری، جلد اول، مرکز تحقیقات تخصصی حسابداری و حسابرسی، سازمان حسابرسی، نشریه 141، چاپ اول.
4. عامری، حسین (1404). نقش میانجی عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی بر تبیین رابطۀ بین افشای داوطلبانۀ اطلاعات و هزینۀ سرمایه با استفاده از مدل CAPMمدیریت دارایی و تأمین مالی، 13(1)،47-62.
5. نادی قمی، ولی، حسینی، سید فرهنگ و مصطفوی، سیده فاطمه. (1399). بررسی اثر قدرت سازوکارهای حاکمیت شرکتی بر ریسک سیستمی نهادهای مالی پذیرفته‌‎شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. تحقیقات مالی 22(2)، 206-226.
6. یگانه، حساس، سلیمی، یحیی (1390). مدلی برای رتبه‌بندی حاکمیت شرکتی در ایران. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 8(30): 1-35.‎
7. Abidi, Ilyes, Mariem Nsaibi, and Khaled Hussainey. 2023. Does Ownership Structure Moderate the Relationship between Systemic Risk and Corporate Governance? Evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15: 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15050216 [DOI:10.3390/jrfm15050216.]
8. Acharya, Viral V., Lasse H. Pedersen, Thomas Philippon, and Matthew Richardson. 2017. Measuring systemic risk. The Review of Financial Studies 30: 2-47. [DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhw088]
9. Alin, Marius Andries, and Nistor Simona. 2016. Systemic risk, corporate governance and regulation of banks across emerging countries. Economics Letters 144: 59-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2016.04.031]
10. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. [DOI:10.2307/2297968]
11. Baltaghi, H. B. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3nd Edition,New York: John Wily & Sons Ltd.
12. Battaglia, Francesca, Domenico Curcio, and Angela Gallo.(2014). Board structure and tail and systemic risk-taking: Evidence from European banks. In DMCA. Norfolk: European Financial Management Association (EFMA), pp. 1-47.
13. Beltratti, Andrea, and René M. Stulz. 2012. The credit crisis around the globe: Why did some banks perform better? Journal of Financial Economics 105: 1-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.12.005]
14. Bushee, B. (2001). Do institutional investors prefer near-term earning over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Research, 18: 207-246. [DOI:10.1092/J4GU-BHWH-8HME-LE0X]
15. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's Q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74. [DOI:10.2307/3665623]
16. Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155-1177. [DOI:10.1086/261354]
17. Díez-Esteban, José María, Jorge Bento Farinha, Conrado Diego García-Gómez, and Cesario Mateus. 2021. Does board composition and ownership structure affect banks' systemic risk? European evidence. Journal of Banking Regulation 21: 1-18.
18. Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger, Robert Prilmeier, and René M. Stulz. 2012. This time is the same: Using bank performance in 1998 to explain bank performance during the recent financial crisis. The Journal of Finance 67: 2139-85. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01783.x]
19. Francis, Bill B., Iftekhar Hasan, and Qiang Wu. 2012. Do corporate boards affect firm performance? New evidence from the financial crisis. New Evidence from the Financial Crisis. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper 11: 2012. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2041194]
20. Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). "Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important?" Financial Management, 38(1), 1-37. [DOI:10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x]
21. Givoly, D. and Palmon, D. (1982). Timeliness of annual earnings announcements: Some empirical evidence. The Accounting Review, Vol. 57, pp.486-508.
22. Iqbal, Jamshed, Sascha Strobl, and Sami Vähämaa. 2015. Corporate governance and the systemic risk of financial institutions. Journal of Economics and Business 82: 42-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeconbus.2015.06.001]
23. Minton, Bernadette A., Jérôme P. Taillard, and Rohan Williamson. 2014. Financial expertise of the board, risk taking, and performance: Evidence from bank holding companies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 49: 351-80. [DOI:10.1017/S0022109014000283]
24. Lintner, J. (1965). Security prices, risk, and maximal gains from diversification. The Journal of Finance, 20(4), 587-615. https://doi.org/10.2307/2977249 [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1965.tb02930.x]
25. Patton, A. J. & Verardo, M. (2012). Does beta move with news? Firm-specific information flows and learning about profitability. Society for Financial Studies, 25(9), 2789-2839. [DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhs073]
26. Pathan, Shams. 2009. Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance 33: 1340-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.02.001]
27. Saghi, Nadia, Zainab Srour, and Jean-Laurent Viviani. 2018. Ownership structure and systemic risk: Evidence from European banks. Semantic Scholar, 1-26. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:211567286
28. Vu, Van Thi Thuy, Nghia Trong Phan, and Hung Ngoc Dang. 2020. Impacts of ownership structure on systemic risk of listed companies in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 7: 107-17. [DOI:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no2.107]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

ameri H. Analyzing the Relationship Between Institutional Ownership and Systematic Risk with Emphasis on the Role of Corporate Governance: Using GMM and EGLS Methods. qjfep 2025; 13 (49) :7-34
URL: http://qjfep.ir/article-1-1703-en.html


Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ۴.۰ International License (CC BY ۴.۰).
Volume 13, Issue 49 (Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economics Policies 2025) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سیاستهای مالی و اقتصادی Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economic Policies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 44 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714