[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Statistical info::
::
Indexing and Abstracting
..
Islamic Economic Association Of Iran
 
..
Social Media
 


..
Paper Plagiarism Checker
 
..
:: Volume 12, Issue 46 (Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economics Policies 2024) ::
qjfep 2024, 12(46): 7-47 Back to browse issues page
Analyzing the Impact of Firm-Specific Variables on Stock Returns: A Fama-French and Fama-Macbeth Approaches
Mohsen Lotfi , Afsaneh Delshad *
Golestan University
Abstract:   (705 Views)
The present study aims to investigate the explanatory power of Fama and French three factor and five factor models in explaining a set of anomalies using Fama and Macbeth regression approaches. For this purpose, a sample of 136 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange was selected over the period from 2008 to 2023. Each anomaly variable was divided into five portfolios and after comparing the average excess returns of the stocks, the explanatory power of different portfolios in terms of number of anomalies is assessed. The overall findings indicate that there is a significant difference between the number of additional returns of stocks in different portfolios based on the investigated anomalies, which means the efficiency of the portfolio. The results of examining the impact of anomalies on the explanation of excess stock returns show that among the investigated anomalies, dividend yield, bankruptcy risk and stock return volatility have a significant impact on explaining excess returns in both three factor and five factor models. However, accruals have not had a significant effect. This result suggests that part of the stock returns can be explained significantly by these variables. In addition, a comparison of the explanatory power of excess stock returns between the three factor and five factor models of Fama and French reveals no significant difference between the two models in terms of capturing the examined anomalie.
Keywords: Stock Returns, Fama and French, Fama and MacBeth, Stock Valuation Models, Anomalies.
Full-Text [PDF 1601 kb]   (172 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. باقی زاده، حامد، طیبی ثانی، احسان، آقابابائی، محمدابراهیم (1402). بررسی رابطه ارزش در معرض ریسک و بازده مقطعی با در نظر گرفتن نقش احساسات سرمایه‌گذار در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. فصلنامه سیاست‌های مالی و اقتصادی، ۱۱ (۴۲)، ۱۳۷-۱۷۱.
2. راعی، رضا، تلنگی، احمد (۱۳۸۳). مدیریت سرمایه‌گذاری پیشرفته، سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی (سمت)، تهران، ایران.
3. شیرمردی، سیده نرجس، صامتی، مجید، شریفی رنانی، حسین (1403). نقش شوک‌های نااطمینانی‌ مالی، مدل پنج عاملی فاما - فرنچ و مومنتوم در بازار سرمایه و تأثیرات آن بر بازده سهام. پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 16(61): 1-50.
4. فرزین فر، علی‌اکبر (1401). ارزیابی بازده سهام با بهره‌گیری از تلفیق الگوی چندعاملی قیمت‌گذاری دارایی‌های سرمایه‌ای و تابع جریمه (پنالتی) در بازار بورس اوراق بهادار تهران و مقایسه آن با الگوی سنج عاملی فاما و فرنچ. دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار (مطالعات مالی)، 14(56 )، 84-101.
5. Alaoui Taib, A., & Benfeddoul, S. (2024). The Empirical Explanatory Power of CAPM and the Fama and French Three-Five Factor Models in the Moroccan Stock Exchange. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(1), 47. [DOI:10.3390/ijfs11010047]
6. Altinay, A. T., Dogan, M., Ergun, B. L. D., & Alshiqi, S. (2023). The Fama & Fernch Five Factor Asset Pricing Model: A Research on Borsa Istanbul. Economic Studies, 32(4).
7. Altman, E. (1968). Financial ratio, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23(1), 589-610. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x]
8. Anuno, F., Madaleno, M., & Vieira, E. (2024). Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Fama-French Three-Factor and Five-Factor Models to Manage Stock and Bond Portfolios: Evidence from Timor-Leste. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(11), 480.‌ [DOI:10.3390/jrfm16110480]
9. Baghizadeh, H., Taieby Sani., E, & Aghababaei, M.E. (2023). Assessing the relationship between value-at-risk and expected returns by considering the impact of investor sentiment in the Tehran Stock Exchange, 11 (42), 137-171, (In Persian). [DOI:10.61186/qjfep.11.42.137]
10. Buditomo, B., Candra, S., & Soetanto, T. V. (2024). Fama and French Five-Factor Study of Stock Market in Indonesia. International Journal of Organizational Behavior and Policy (IJOBP), 3(1), 39-52.‌ [DOI:10.9744/ijobp.3.1.39-52]
11. Carhart. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of finance, 52(1), 57-82. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x]
12. Ekman, N. (2022). The Predictive Ability of Financial Ratios on Stock Return. A study of the S&P Global 100 during 2000-2020,‌ https://gupea.ub.gu-.se/handle/2077/71243.
13. Fama, E., & French, K., (2017). International tests of a five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 441-463. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.11.004]
14. Fama, E., & French, K. (2015). A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010]
15. Fama, E. F., & French, K.R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33(1), 3-56.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90027-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00038-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90020-7 [DOI:10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5]
16. Fama, E.F. and MacBeth, J.D. (1973). Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607-636. [DOI:10.1086/260061]
17. Farzinfar, A. (2023). Evaluating stock returns using a combination of multi-factor pricing model for capital assets and the function of penalty in Tehran Stock Exchange market and its comparison with five factors Fama and French Model. Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis, 14(56): 84-101, (In Persian).
18. Hanauer, M. X., Kononova, M., & Rapp, M.S. (2022). Boosting agnostic fundamental analysis: Using machine learning to identify mispricing in European stock markets. Finance Research Letters, 48. [DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2022.102856]
19. Hou, K., Xue, C., & Zhang, L. (2012). Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(3), 650-705. [DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhu068]
20. Huynh, T.D. (2018). Explaining anomalies in Australia with a five‐factor asset pricing model. International Review of Finance, 18(1), 123-135. [DOI:10.1111/irfi.12125]
21. Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37. [DOI:10.2307/1924119]
22. Rahman, M.A. (2022). Forecasting stock prices on the basis of technical analysis in the industrial sectors of the UK stock market. Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff Metropolitan University.
23. Oyedeko, Y. O., Kolawole, O. S., Ibrahim, I., & Zharikova, O. (2023). Risk-Return Relationship in the Nigerian Stock Market: Comparative between Fama-French Five-Factor Model and Higher Moment Fama-French Five-Factor Model. Oblik i finansi, 99, 68-78. [DOI:10.33146/2307-9878-2023-1(99)-68-78]
24. Raei, R & Talangi, A. (2008). Advanced investment management. Samt public Tehran, Iran, (In Persian).
25. Sharpe, W.F. (1964). Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3): 425-442. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x]
26. Shen, H., Zheng, S., Xiong, H., Tang, W., Dou, J., & Silverman, H. (2022). Stock market mispricing and firm innovation based on path analysis, Economic Modelling, 95: 330-343.‌ [DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2020.03.001]
27. Shirmardi, S .N., Sameti, M., & Sharifi Renan, H.(2024) .The Role of Financial Uncertainty Shocks, Fama French Five Factor Model and Momentum in the Capital Market and Its Effects on Stock Returns. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 16(61), 1-50, (In Persian).
28. Singh, M.P. (2023). Financial Distress Risk and Stock Return: A Review. Economics and Commerce, 14(01).
29. Suharti, S., & Murwaningsari, E. (2024). The Effect of Profit Persistency, Business Risk and Capital Structure on Earnings Return Coefficient with Good Corporate Governance as Moderating Variable. Journal of Applied Business and Technology, 5(1), 1-7.‌ [DOI:10.35145/jabt.v5i1.158]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Lotfi M, Delshad A. Analyzing the Impact of Firm-Specific Variables on Stock Returns: A Fama-French and Fama-Macbeth Approaches. qjfep 2024; 12 (46) :7-47
URL: http://qjfep.ir/article-1-1599-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 46 (Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economics Policies 2024) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سیاستهای مالی و اقتصادی Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economic Policies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 44 queries by YEKTAWEB 4692