[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Statistical info::
::
Indexing and Abstracting
..
Islamic Economic Association Of Iran
 
..
Social Media
 


..
Paper Plagiarism Checker
 
..
:: Volume 12, Issue 48 (Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economics Policies 2025) ::
qjfep 2025, 12(48): 189-233 Back to browse issues page
A Quantitative Model of Resistance Economy Using Accounting Metrics and Its Impact on Stock Returns
Sayed Ali Vaez , Rahim Bonabi ghadim *
Department of Accounting, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (431 Views)

One of the key drivers in achieving the goals of the resistance economy is leveraging accounting and auditing in corporate reporting and operations. This requires transforming the components of the resistance economy into measurable and tangible accounting criteria and implementing oversight to achieve these objectives. This study aims to develop a quantitative model of the resistance economy using accounting metrics and examine its impact on stock returns as an indicator of market efficiency. To conceptualize the resistance economy, the study employs the following accounting metrics: disclosure quality (a direct measure of economic transparency), investment efficiency (an inverse measure of consumption management and productivity growth), research and development (R&D) and intellectual capital (direct measures for a knowledge-based economy), product market competition (a direct measure of economic competitiveness), opportunistic earnings manipulation control (a tool for combating corruption), and corporate governance (an executive arm of the resistance economy). The study utilizes data from 103 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange from 1393 to 1401, employing multivariate regression and exploratory factor analysis. The results indicate that disclosure quality, R&D, intellectual capital, product market competition, and corporate governance have a significant positive impact on expected returns, while investment inefficiency and opportunistic earnings manipulation have a significant negative impact. By introducing a five-factor model using factor analysis, it was found that the second factor-investment efficiency (an inverse measure for consumption management and productivity growth) and earnings manipulation control (a tool for combating corruption)-exerts the strongest negative influence, whereas the fifth factor-R&D (a direct measure for a knowledge-based economy)-has the weakest positive impact on expected stock returns.

Keywords: Resistance Economy, Expected Returns, Product Market Competition, Corporate Governance, Intellectual Capitall
Full-Text [PDF 1364 kb]   (133 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. امیری، حسین؛ پیرداده بیرانوند، محبوبه؛ نوروزی عموقین، فریبا و علیزاده، شیوا. (1397). برآورد شاخص‌های آسیب‌پذیری و تاب‌آوری در اقتصاد ایران. سیاست‌های راهبردی و کلان، 6(23)، 434-455.
2. براهویی، مریم؛ حکیمیان، سمیرا (۱۳۹۵). نقش حسابداری در اقتصاد مقاومتی، کنفرانس بین‌المللی نخبگان مدیریت، تهران، موسسه سرآمد همایش کارین.21-1.
3. تهرانی، رضا و حصار زاده، رضا (1388). تأثیر جریان‌های نقدی آزاد و محدودیت در تأمین مالی بر بیش و کم سرمایه‌گذاری، مجله‌ی تحقیقات حسابداری،1(3)،67-50.
4. فشاری، مجید؛ پورغفار، جواد (1393). بررسی و تبیین الگوی اقتصاد مقاومتی در اقتصاد ایران. مجله اقتصادی (دوماهنامه بررسی مسائل و سیاست‌های اقتصادی). ۱۴ (۵ و ۶)، ۲۹-۴۰.
5. مدرس، احمد و حصارزاده، رضا.)1387). کیفیت گزارشگری مالی و کارایی سرمایه‌گذاری، فصلنامه بورس و اوراق بهادار، 1(2)، 116-85.
6. نوری دوآبی، پیام و صدری نیا، محمد (1395). حسابداری و حسابرسی لازمه تحقق اقتصاد مقاومتی، اولین کنفرانس بین‌المللی دستاوردهای نوین پژوهشی در مدیریت، حسابداری و اقتصاد، تهران، دفتر کنفدراسیون بین‌المللی مخترعین جهان در ایران، دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی مینو،26-1.
7. Abdoh, H., & Varela, O. (2017). Product market competition, idiosyncratic and systematic volatility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43(1), 500-513. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.02.009]
8. Ahmed, S., Bu, Z., & Ye, X. (2023). Product market competition, labor mobility, and the cross-section of stock returns. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 13(3), 440-480. [DOI:10.1093/rapstu/raad001]
9. Alam, M. S. (2022). Is trade, energy consumption and economic growth threat to [DOI:10.1108/IJES-12-2021-0084]
10. environmental quality in Bahrain-evidence from VECM and ARDL bound test approach. Int. J. Emerg. Serv. 11 (3), 396-408. [DOI:10.1108/IJES-12-2021-0084]
11. Alfan, A. T., Harahap, N., & Harahap, M. I. (2024). Socioeconomic Development
12. Sustainability Analysis: A Review of Corporate CSR and ESG in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics Development Research, 5(1), 312-335.
13. Ali S., Murtaza, G., Hedvicakova, M., Jiang, J. & Naeem, M. (2022). Intellectual capital and financial performance: A comparative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 967820. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967820] [PMID] []
14. Aljuboori, Z. M., Singh, H., Haddad, H., Al-Ramahi, N. M., & Ali, M. A. (2021). Intellectual capital and firm performance correlation: the mediation role of innovation capability in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs perspective. Sustainability, 14(1), 154. [DOI:10.3390/su14010154]
15. Andriamahery, A., & Qamruzzaman, M. (2022a). Do access to finance, technical know-how, and financial literacy offer women empowerment through women's entrepreneurial development? [Original research]. Front. Psychol. 12, 776844. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.776844] [PMID] []
16. Bhutto, N. A., Shaique, M., Kanwal, S., & Matlani, A. (2021). Impact of earnings management practices on stock return. The Indonesian Capital Market Review, 13(1), 2. [DOI:10.21002/icmr.v13i1.12839]
17. Biddle, G., Hilary, G., & Verdi, R.S. (2009). How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 112-131. [DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.001]
18. Billett, M. T., Garfinkel, A., & Jiang, Y. (2011). The influence of governance on investment: Evidence from a hazard model. Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (3), 643-670. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.07.004]
19. Chen, S., Sun, Z., Tang, S., & Wu, D. (2011). Government intervention and investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17 (2), 259-271. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.08.004]
20. Dang, D. Q., Korkos, I., & Wu, W. (2023). The effects of earnings management on information asymmetry and stock price synchronicity. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), 2290359. [DOI:10.1080/23322039.2023.2290359]
21. Farooq, U., Tabash, M. I., Anagreh, S., & Khudoykulov, K. (2022). How do market capitalization and intellectual capital determine industrial investment? Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(4), 828-837. [DOI:10.1016/j.bir.2022.05.002]
22. Felipe, J., & Estrada, G. (2020). What Happened to the World's Potential Growth after the 2008- 2009 Global Financial Crisis? Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,1-23, 101072 [DOI:10.1016/j.jjie.2020.101072]
23. Gaio, C., Gonçalves, T. C., & Cardoso, J. (2023). Investment efficiency and earnings quality: European evidence. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(4), 224. [DOI:10.3390/jrfm16040224]
24. Gashe, K., Sime, Z., & Mada, M. (2024). Intellectual capital and economic growth: evidence from some selected countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 12(1), 2330429. [DOI:10.1080/23322039.2024.2330429]
25. Guariglia, A., & Yang, J. (2016). A balancing act: Managing financial constraints and agency costs to minimize investment inefficiency in the Chinese market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 36 (6), 111-130. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.006]
26. Ha, N. M., Do, B. N., & Trung, T. N. (2022). The impact of family ownership on firm performance: A study on Vietnam. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). 2038417. [DOI:10.1080/23322039.2022.2038417]
27. Hassani, B. K., & Bahini, Y. (2022). Relationships between ESG disclosure and economic growth: A critical review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(11), 538. [DOI:10.3390/jrfm15110538]
28. Hennebry, B. (2020). The Determinants of Economic Resilience in Rural Regions. An Examination of the Portuguese Case. Regional Studies on Development, 24(1), 24-29. [DOI:10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0001]
29. Ho, K. C., Lee, S. C., & Sun, P. W. (2022). Disclosure quality, price efficiency, and expected returns. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 59(3), 101573. [DOI:10.1016/j.najef.2021.101573]
30. Htay, N.S. (2012). Corporate governance and strategic information disclosure in Malaysian listed banks, International Review of Business Research Papers, 8(1), 196-210.
31. Iswati, S., & Anshori, M., (2007). The influence of intellectual capital to financial performance at insurance companies in Jakarta Stock Exchange (JSE), Proceedings of the 13th Asia Pacific Management Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 1393 - 1399.
32. Jamil, M. (2021). Product Market Competition Profitability and Stock Return: Evidence From Pakistsn. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 3(4), 713-725. [DOI:10.52567/pjsr.v3i4.422]
33. Jang, G. Y., Kang, H. G., & Kim, W. (2022). Corporate executives' incentives and ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 49(2), 103-187. [DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2022.103187]
34. Jin, L., Li, Z., Lu, L., & Ni, X. (2023). Does stock market rescue affect investment efficiency in the real sector?. Journal of Financial Markets, 65(3), 100859. [DOI:10.1016/j.finmar.2023.100859]
35. Liao, S., & Errico, M. (2023). Corporate investment and stock market valuation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 50(3-4), 795-819. [DOI:10.1111/jbfa.12649]
36. Lim, M., How, J., & Verhoeven, P. (2014).Corporate ownership, corporate governance reform and timeliness of earnings: Malaysian evidence, Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10(1), 32-45. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcae.2013.11.001]
37. Limijaya, A., Hutagaol-Martowidjojo, Y., & Hartanto, E. (2021). Intellectual capital and firm performance in Indonesia: The moderating role of corporate governance. International Journal of Management, Finance and Accounting, 13(6), 159-182. [DOI:10.1504/IJMFA.2021.117772]
38. Lin, J., & Qamruzzaman, M. (2023). The impact of environmental disclosure and the quality of financial disclosure and IT adoption on firm performance: Does corporate governance ensure sustainability?. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11(1), 1002357. [DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1002357]
39. Lu, Y. (2011). Political connections and trade expansion: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Economics of Transition 19 (2), 231-254. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0351.2010.00402.x]
40. Maharani, A., & Narsa, I. M. (2023). Six-factor plus intellectual capital in the capital asset pricing model and excess stock return: Empirical evidence in emerging stock markets. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), 2252652. [DOI:10.1080/23322039.2023.2252652]
41. Mahran, H. A. (2023). The impact of governance on economic growth: spatial econometric approach. Review of Economics and Political Science, 8(1), 37-53. [DOI:10.1108/REPS-06-2021-0058]
42. Mueller, D. C., & Peev, E. (2007). Corporate governance and investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35 (2), 414- 437. [DOI:10.1016/j.jce.2007.02.001]
43. Murshed, M., Haseeb, M., & Alam, M. S. (2022). The environmental kuznets curve
44. hypothesis for carbon and ecological footprints in south asia: The role of renewable energy. GeoJournal 87 (3), 2345-2372. [DOI:10.1007/s10708-020-10370-6]
45. Peet, R. & H. Elaine (2009). Theories of Development Contentions,Arguments, Alternatives, The Guilford Press, Second Edition.
46. Risal, R., Mustaruddin, M., & Afifah, N. (2024). ESG disclosure and company profitability: Does company size play a role?. Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED), 6(2), 390-399.
47. Seetharaman, A., Kevin, L.T., & Saravanan, A.S., (2004). Comparative Justification on Intellectual Capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(4), 522-539. [DOI:10.1108/14691930410566997]
48. Shehata, N. F. (2014). Theories and Determinants of Voluntary Disclosure, Accounting and Finance Research, 3(1),1-36. [DOI:10.5430/afr.v3n1p18]
49. Stevanović, T., Ivanović-Đukić, M., Rađenović, T., & Radović, O. (2018). The impact of national intellectual capital on the economic growth in the South-Eastern European Countries. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 36(2), 777-800. [DOI:10.18045/zbefri.2018.2.777]
50. Streeten, P. (2007). Good Governance: History and Development of the Concept, Paper Presented at the Paper Delivered at a Symposium [Available online]
51. Tang, S., & Alvita, W. (2021). The effect of earnings management to stock return on company listed in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Jagaditha, 8(2), 194-201. [DOI:10.22225/jj.8.2.2021.194-201]
52. Tansel, A., & Ozdemir, Z. A. (2018). Unemployment invariance hypothesis, added and discouraged worker effects in Canada. International Journal of Manpower, 39(7), 929-936. [DOI:10.1108/IJM-04-2017-0059]
53. Toma, C.A., Boboc, C., Vasile, V., & Ghiță, S. I. (2021). Income inequality shift paradigm. From economic approach to sharing responsibilities. Amfiteatru Economic, 23(15), 964-981. [DOI:10.24818/EA/2021/S15/964]
54. Tayles, M., Pike, R.H., & Sofian, S. (2007). Intellectual capital, management, accounting practices and corporate performance, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(4), 522-548. [DOI:10.1108/09513570710762575]
55. Toader, L., Paraschiv, D., Dinu, V., Manea, D., & Mihai, M. (2023). The effects of private sector companies' research and development investments on the adoption of cloud computing services in the European :union:.1-38. [DOI:10.15240/tul/001/2023-2-012]
56. Tran, N. P., Dinh, C. T. H., Hoang, H. T. T., & Vo, D. H. (2022). Intellectual capital and firm performance in Vietnam: The moderating role of corporate social responsibility. Sustainability, 14(3), 12763. [DOI:10.3390/su141912763]
57. Tran, P. N., & Vo, H. D. (2023). The Impact of Intellectual Capital and Corporate Governance on Bank Performance in Vietnam. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Tài chính-Marketing, 12-25. [DOI:10.52932/jfm.vi6.435]
58. Vasudevan, H. L. (2022). Leadership style and company performance in the manufacturing industry. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 7(3).1-12.
59. Vo, X. V., Chu, T. K. H., & McMillan, D. (2019). Do foreign shareholders improve corporate earnings quality in emerging markets? Evidence from Vietnam. Cogent Economics & Finance, 7(1), 1698940. [DOI:10.1080/23322039.2019.1698940]
60. Zamanianfar, L., Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., Banimahd, B., Nikoomaram, H., & Deilami, Z. (2021). The Role of Earnings Management in Economic Growth and Corporate Growth Illusion. Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 5(4), 769.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Vaez S A, bonabi ghadim R. A Quantitative Model of Resistance Economy Using Accounting Metrics and Its Impact on Stock Returns. qjfep 2025; 12 (48) :189-233
URL: http://qjfep.ir/article-1-1661-en.html


Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ۴.۰ International License (CC BY ۴.۰).
Volume 12, Issue 48 (Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economics Policies 2025) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سیاستهای مالی و اقتصادی Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economic Policies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710